If it was offered to me I wouldnt take it BoydBarrett will

admin trdrw , , , ,

first_imgPEOPLE BEFORE PROFIT TD Richard Boyd-Barrett said that he would not take up Stephen Donnelly’s now vacant seat on the banking inquiry if he was offered it.Boyd-Barrett said that he believes that fellow Technical Group member Joe Higgins is next in line to take to take Donnelly’s place, but added that all three were conflicted about sitting on the inquiry in the first instance.“If it was offered to me I wouldn’t take it,” he told TheJournal.ie.“It’s a joke at this point, the Government are trying to control it, there is no serious effort to get to the bottom of what actually happened.”Boyd-Barrett explained that himself, Donnelly and Higgins had essentially drawn lots to be selected as the Technical Group’s representative but even then were unsure whether they should take part.“All of us were torn, both myself and Stephen were very torn as to if we should even put our names forward for it at all.”Donnelly’s withdrawal comes after a week in which the Government lost its majority on the inquiry and then, after failing to remove a Fianna Fáil Senator, added two Government Senators to ensure a majority.Junior Minister and Labour leadership candidate Alex White said this afternoon that the banking inquiry should have been ‘left well alone’ after the initial line-up was completed.Speaking on RTÉ’s The Week in Politics, White said that he would have preferred if the original line-up with four Government members out of nine had remained.Personally I would have left it well alone when the the original choice of members was made. But what’s done is done now and instead of having nine members with a Government majority as was proposed, we now have 11 members with Government majority.White said that he felt it had “not been a good week for politics in this country” after the Government had altered procedure to add an extra Fine Gael and Labour Senator to the inquiry.“I don’t think the inquiry is robbed of all credibility,” he said when asked if Donnelly’s withdrawal had fatally flawed it.“I think what we should do is get on with it now,” he added expressing confidence in chairman of the inquiry, Labour’s Ciarán Lynch TD.Fianna Fáil’s Marc MacSharry, who the Government tried to remove from the inquiry, disagreed that there was understanding that the Government would have a majority:Plan A was to discredit myself which failed spectacularly and then Plan B kicked in which was to rip-up the rules of democracy and do what they wanted.“No party can stand to benefit from the truth coming out more than Fianna Fáil,” he added. “We wanted an independent Leveson style inquiry from the beginning. We didn’t get that.”Speaking on the same programme, Socialist Party TD Ruth Coppinger says that she believes the inquiry should be made up of groups from outside of politics.“I think it’s been really cynical. The people who should be in the majority on that inquiry are the people who are affected by the banking crisis…Not the people who cheerleaded the property bubble, it didn’t happen on one night in 2008,” she said.Read: Stephen Donnelly quits banking inquiry, says Taoiseach stated that he will try to control it >Poll: Is the banking inquiry now irreparably damaged? >last_img

You May Also Like..

It’s my party and I’ll cry (foul) if I want to

first_imgShare on Facebook Tweet on Twitter I must have been getting sleepy last night as I made an error in posting at the 10:05 pm above posting. I meant to post AA, the state attorney prosecutor that is in the news, not the attorney general, as I posted, in mistake. Sorry. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Mama Mia Mama Mia Support conservation and fish with NEW Florida specialty license plate TAGSGreg Jackson Previous articleFaith communities provide hope for the homelessNext articleA violent weekend in South Apopka concludes with two shootings Denise Connell RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Mama Mia April 2, 2017 at 10:05 pm You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here If Republican was my party choice, I would be crying for sure, the way Trump administration is going! Ana Centeno April 15, 2017 at 2:29 pm Reply Please enter your name here April 2, 2017 at 10:39 pm The Anatomy of Fear center_img Free webinar for job seekers on best interview answers, hosted by Goodwill June 11 Reply April 3, 2017 at 8:19 am I support the governor on this issue, who wants to remove her permanently, but I don’t support his latest tactic to cut her office budget harshly and the 21 jobs, is what I believe I read. That is going too far, and will only hurt victim’s families seeking justice, but I know now who’s idea that was, he who is from Seminole Co. and that figures! If this is one of the things you possibly could be in disagreement with the Democrats on, Greg. No one is going to agree on everything anyway, especially the death penalty. Reply April 2, 2017 at 10:20 pm Mama Mia 5 COMMENTS Her name is Aramis Ayala. Attorney General Aramis Ayala has not broken any laws with her decision of not seeking the death penalty on murder cases that she will prosecute. Anyone has the right to opine but accusations need to be proven. Please go to Florida State book of laws and prove to the people of Florida that her decision is unlawful. Her only mistake was to go public with her plans. Reply LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply Please enter your comment! Reply I would not worry about it Greg unless you are hoping to be a member of the electoral college, LOL. I am not sure who you are referring to in the Democrat party or what issues you are referring to, but I highly suspect it is AA the attorney general who is apparently enjoying her new found fame and challenging the laws of Florida. I read everyday where the Democrat party, generally speaking, supports her, but I don’t! Is there a litmus test to be a Democrat?OpinionBy Greg Jackson, Esq.Greg JacksonQuestion: Did anyone get the memo stating that when you register with a political party you must leave your personal beliefs, morals, common sense and opinions at the door? Well, many Democrats, such as myself, have learned that if you do not agree with the direction, leadership or agenda of the party, it is best that you keep quiet or risk being ostracized by party hardliners who oftentimes are found in leadership at the local level. If you voice an opinion that differs from the party’s, no matter if it is based on credible evidence or common sense, you may even be considered “not-a-real-Democrat.” I have learned that when weak or unethical Democrats, who are supported by party “insiders,” run for elected office, you better support them even if their moral and/or ethical shortcomings conflict with your own. If you opt, instead to stand on principal, there is a very good likelihood that you will be considered a troublemaker or even worse marked as a Republican, which in Democrat-speak is next to the worst thing on the planet Earth. Admittedly, the scenarios I am describing are typically based on the actions of the hardcore members of the party. For the most part, Democrats (conservative, moderate, etc.) do not agree with everything the party stands for and will seek common ground with members of other parties to get things done. These efforts to work together are actually very healthy for the future growth of the party. However, the unfortunate reality is that for the most part, the hardcore element of the party is typically the most vocal and garner the most attention. (NOTE: I fully recognize that these same sentiments are felt in the Republican, Libertarian, Green Parties, etc.).As the political landscape changes in Orange County, it is undeniable that the number of Republican voters is declining while Democratic voters’ numbers are inching up slightly. That for the most part is due to the Democratic party spending considerably more time with voter registration. These efforts, help to “pack-the-field” with more democratic minded voters who, when called upon, for the most part will go to the polls and vote for a Democrat. However, what cannot be ignored is that the fastest growing political party in Orange County and across the State is arguably N.P.A., which stands for Non-Party Affiliates. It appears that as party loyalist seek to make it mandatory for its members to blindly follow but not question, people are looking to go to a party where they can speak and vote freely.What parties seem to forget is that politics is merely a process, not a definition of who we are as individuals. In my experience, when people are asked about the things that are most important to them, the order is typically: God, family, country, etc. If they were to become robots of a political party, the list would be: party affiliation, party agenda, party elected officials, and I think you get where I am going. My point is this, first and foremost, in the context of political importance, we are Americans. Our votes, focus and support should, and would be better spent, going with those candidates and ideas that will keep our country at the top of the list of being the greatest country ever to be in existence. Next, parties need to understand that constructive disagreements help us to all become stronger, as a party and as a nation. In the midst of disagreement there is always a happy median, a place where we can work together to better our communities. Next, speaking against the position of a candidate or elected official in your own party is actually healthy and can result in better leadership and support. That is because the ability to recognize shortcomings and honestly addressing those things lends credibility to the party. Instead of being seen as a robot or puppet, you will be viewed as a fair-minded person people can trust to give honest assessments and opinions. Interestingly, Community leaders are always encouraging people “if you see something, say something.” That same concept should be encouraged in politics to help ensure that we get candidates and elected officials who will best serve our communities and collective interest, which is important to the survival and betterment of our nationGreg Jackson is a past Assistant Attorney General for the State of Florida, military veteran, current Orange County District 2 Representative on the Board of Zoning Adjustments, and General Counsel for the Community Redevelopment Agency. He has been as an active member of the Central Florida community for nearly 20 years. He was most recently a candidate for the Florida House District 45 seat.last_img

‘$25m donated online by over 368,000 donors in one week’

first_img About Howard Lake Howard Lake is a digital fundraising entrepreneur. Publisher of UK Fundraising, the world’s first web resource for professional fundraisers, since 1994. Trainer and consultant in digital fundraising. Founder of Fundraising Camp and co-founder of GoodJobs.org.uk. Researching massive growth in giving. ‘$25m donated online by over 368,000 donors in one week’ AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis  15 total views,  1 views today AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis The magazine includes snapshots of the donations handled by various major online corporates on behalf of the emergency organisations.Total collected: $6,147,226.06 Number of gifts: 160,326 Average gift: $38.34AOL Time Warner:Total collected: $13 millionNumber of gifts: estimate 128,700Average gift: over $100Helping.Org:Total collected: approx. $4 millionNumber of gifts: approx. 39,600Average gift: over $100PayPalTotal collected: $1,325,439Number of gifts: 36,794Average gift: $36.02Yahoo!Total collected: $300,611.75 Number of gifts: 2918 Average gift: $103.02 The ePhilanthropyFoundation claims that $25 million has been donated online in one week in response to the attacks in America on 11 September.The American ePhilanthropyFoundation reports that “since September 11, more than $25 million has been donated by over 368,000 donors providing an overall average gift of $68.” Advertisement Howard Lake | 18 September 2001 | Newslast_img

Barnardos Ireland appoints AMA in DRTV campaign

first_img AMA Charity Services, the Northern Ireland based direct marketing agency serving the not-for-profit sector, have been selected by Barnardos Ireland to handle inbound calls generated from a 4 week DRTV campaign.The new Irish campaign commenced on 13th March and is focused on funds to support Barnardos’ work in lifting children out of poverty. The ad is themed around the importance of education in breaking the cycle of poverty.The DRTV ad aims to recruit regular Irish donors, or “Childhood Friends” to help support vulnerable children in focusing on their learning and development. The ask is for monthly donations from as little as ‚€7. Advertisement  31 total views,  1 views today AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis Tagged with: Ireland AMA is expecting around 1000 calls throughout the 4-week duration of the DRTV and supporting radio campaign. They will also be handling fulfilment of all thank-you letters, donation forms and information leaflets. Barnardos Ireland appoints AMA in DRTV campaigncenter_img AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis Howard Lake | 23 March 2006 | News About Howard Lake Howard Lake is a digital fundraising entrepreneur. Publisher of UK Fundraising, the world’s first web resource for professional fundraisers, since 1994. Trainer and consultant in digital fundraising. Founder of Fundraising Camp and co-founder of GoodJobs.org.uk. Researching massive growth in giving.last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *